Splintering Urbanism 1

In discussion on Splintering Urbanism, maybe the paper by Marie-Hélène Zérah, “Splintering urbanism in Mumbai: Contrasting trends in a multilayered society” would be useful.

Abstract: This paper is an examination of the splintering urbanism argument of the relationship between neo-liberal reforms of infrastructure networks and urban cohesion. Based on an analysis of historical and contemporary processes of infrastructure provision (water, sewerage and power) in colonial/post-colonial Bombay/Mumbai, it questions the assumption of a “modern infrastructure ideal” in the context of developing cities. In Mumbai, the historical analysis reveals the contradictions between this ideal and a hierarchical society. From the outset, access to services (particularly water and sewerage) was highly distorted in favour of the elites, even though utilities networks contributed to urban integration through cross-subsidies within and across sectors, and through the setting up of municipal institutions.
Second, ongoing sectoral reforms demonstrate contrasting trends as increased differentiation of services produces both positive – better adaptation to users’ needs – and potentially negative – FRAGMENTING – socio-spatial implications.
Third, an understudied potential fragmenting threat also lies in the sectoral approach to reforms as it undermines the existing cross-sector subsidies and prevents the articulation of utility reforms with other limiting factors, such as land and transport, which are the main constraints for expanding housing and mobility in the city. (Source: http://www.sciencedirect.com, refer to:
Geoforum Volume 39, Issue 6, November 2008, Pages 1922-1932 Placing Splintering Urbanism)